Do you think orbs are a legitimate piece of ghost evidence? Why or why not?
My Answer: I don't exactly dismiss orbs as not being legitimate evidence. I just think that it's so easy for some to be explained as nothing but dust. I think that you shouldn't just assume that every ball-like object on a photograph is an orb. I look at orbs as being circumstantial evidence. It may be considered evidence but you need more to really lock down a conviction.